Internet for people or not?
Thus it summed up to the fact that the biggest part of my income is internet, or more specifically advertising on websites etc. Dealing with it, it became so obvious to me that nobody makes something for nothing.By that i mean that everybody can be devided into 2 groups:
1) people who gets information from the internet
2)people who places this information.
the second group reminds me of a factory which starts with designers,programers,content fillers shorlty speaking - publishers. But the main factor of it all is - MONEY.In other words not me,not a sober-minded webmaster isn’t insterested,Firstly,in giving group 1 information.It’s just a necessity,without it he won’t be able to get any income.
It feels kind of strange when you start thinking about lots of people scanning useless books and rewriting to different words the same texts every hour for getting an unique content and make money out of visitors.
Running all these through my mind, i came to a conclusion that internet has already been overfilled with information for a long time and there are no unspoken themes.But people don’t want to stop,they continue cloning what has already been done,continue writing what has already been written,load 100 times things that are already loaded etc.
I ask: for what? thank god,searchers stopped indexong ununique texts,what this doesn’t solve the problem! On the contrary,this is only opening a new marasmic field of paying for text. Let’s take for example www.textbroker.ru, we’ll probably see something like content: cost for 1000 symbols - from 2$. What can a person write about ,for instance, a medical theme when he’s being payed 2$? and this information will be read! somebody will realize it,we’ll change somebody’s conscious and opinions.I’m afraid to think to what can this “pseudo - info” mechanism lead…
P.S: by the way one manner of advancing is placing articles on the Atricle catalogue